Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Atkinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1951No. 233PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.

The claim of the plaintiffs is founded upon a complaint alleging that Andrew Atkinson devised the 35 acres to them by a last will, which has never been admitted to probate.

It appears, therefore, that the complaint undertakes to present to the court for determination this crucial issue: Did Andrew Atkinson leave a will devising the 35 acres to the plaintiffs?

This being true, the complaint discloses upon its face that the court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action; for under the law of North Carolina the issue of whether an unprobated script is, or is not, a man’s last will…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brissie v. CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Ricks v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. In Re Will of HedgepethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. McCormick v. . JerniganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. Ricks v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Maola Ice Cream Co. v. Maola Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Farthing v. FarthingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Howell v. Commercial Credit Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Anderson v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API