Anderson v. Atkinson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.
The claim of the plaintiffs is founded upon a complaint alleging that Andrew Atkinson devised the 35 acres to them by a last will, which has never been admitted to probate.
It appears, therefore, that the complaint undertakes to present to the court for determination this crucial issue: Did Andrew Atkinson leave a will devising the 35 acres to the plaintiffs?
This being true, the complaint discloses upon its face that the court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action; for under the law of North Carolina the issue of whether an unprobated script is, or is not, a man’s last will…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brissie v. CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Ricks v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- In Re Will of HedgepethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- McCormick v. . JerniganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Ricks v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Maola Ice Cream Co. v. Maola Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Farthing v. FarthingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Howell v. Commercial Credit Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Anderson v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.