Bennett v. Attorney General of North Carolina
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, C. J.
Let it be noted at the outset that the record and case on appeal do not contain any express exception to any ruling of the trial judge. Nevertheless the appeal to the Supreme Court is itself an exception to the judgment. Holden v. Holden, ante, 1, 95 S.E. 2d 118; Barnette v. Woody, 242 N.C. 424, 88 S.E. 2d 223; Lowie Co. v. Atkins, ante, 98, 95 S.E. 2d 271.
Indeed an exception to the judgment rendered raises the question as to whether error in law appears upon the face of the record. See Lowie & Co. v. Atkins, supra; Horn v. Furniture Co., ante, 173, 95 S.E. 2d 521, and cases cited. And the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barnette v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Thornton v. . BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- EL LOWIE & COMPANY v. AtkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Yount v. YountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Henry v. CottinghamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- Penley v. PenleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Banner v. North Carolina National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.