Legal Opinion
Aktiebolaget Bofors v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 12, 1957No. 206-53PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaddeN, Judge
The plaintiff sues for damages for an alleged breach of contract by the United States. It made a contract with the United States on June 21, 1941, licensing the United States to “make, use and have made in the United States” a type of 40 mm. anti-aircraft gun which the plaintiff had developed. It claims that its contract, properly interpreted, contained an agreement on the part of the United States not to export such guns and thus compete with the plaintiff’s interest in *644selling guns, or licenses to manufacture them, to other countries.
As we have said, the contract was made in 1941. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Aktiebolaget Bofors v. United States (Two Cases). Aktiebolaget Bofors v. Acheson, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- George J. Grant Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
3Cited by14 opinions
- Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- International Engineering Company, Division of A-T-O, Inc. v. Elliott L. Richardson, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Cummings v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Underwater Storage, Inc. v. United States Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.