Legal Opinion

Hertz Penske Truck Leasing Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1994No. 1926 C.D.1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

168 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 657 (1994)

651 A.2d 1145

HERTZ PENSKE TRUCK LEASING COMPANY, Petitioner,

v.

WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (BOWERS), Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted on Briefs September 21, 1994.

Decided November 30, 1994.

Reargument Denied February 6, 1995.

Dale A. Cable and Rhonda A. Rudman, for petitioner.

Bruce T. Rosen, for respondent.

Before COLINS, President Judge, and DOYLE, SMITH, PELLEGRINI, FRIEDMAN, KELLEY and NEWMAN, JJ.

DOYLE, Judge.

Hertz Penske Truck Leasing Company (Employer) appeals an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Vinglinsky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Cudo v. Hallstead Foundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Busche v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API