Legal Opinion

Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 29, 1984No. Appeal, No. 984 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

Maryann Smith (Claimant) appeals from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board *509(Board) dated April 1, 1982, which reversed .the decision of the referee and dismissed her Petition for Reinstatement.

The Board reversed the decision of the referee on the basis of an error of law; however, the fact findings of the referee were not disturbed. The referee found as fact that Claimant suffered a compensable injury on July 25,1975, and received compensation from July 26, 1975, through October 24, 1976. At that time Claimant returned to work with Futura Industries…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Klingler v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Steinle v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Airco-Speer Electronics v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. John W. Galbreath & Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Halloran v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Spinabelli v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Economy Decorators, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Wells-Moore v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Bennett v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API