Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Phipps v. Comprehensive Community Development Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 16, 2001No. 99 Civ. 5172(JGK)PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Claudette Phipps (“Phipps”) brings this qui tam action on behalf of the United States against Comprehensive Community Development Corporation, d/b/a Soundview Health Center (“CCDC”), Nonprofit Community Resources, Inc. (“NCR”), Pedro Espada (“Espada”), Sandra Love (“Love”), Kenneth Brennan (“Brennan”), Esther Hill (“Hill”), and Maria Cruz (“Cruz”), each in their official and individual capacities pursuant to the False Claims Act, 21 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. (“FCA”). Phipps has also brought common law claims for unjust enrichment, fraud, and…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Rockefeller v. Westinghouse Electric Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. RorechDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Zirogiannis v. Seterus, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- United States Ex Rel. Taylor v. GabelliDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Dean v. Town of HempsteadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.