Legal Opinion

Barrington Manor Apartments Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 12, 1972No. 17-66PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cowen, Ohief Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment again bring before us plaintiff’s claim involving 24 C.F.B. § 207.253 (1966), a regulation of the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), now in the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The regulation imposes an “adjusted premium charge” of one percent of the original face amount of an FHA-insured mortgage if the mortgage is prepaid in full or the contract of insurance is voluntarily terminated after 5 years from the date of initial endorsement for insurance. The regulation also affords…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Camellia Apartments, Inc., the W & W Company, University Apartments, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  2. Forrest Village Apartments, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Grymes Hill Manor Estates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Harris v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  5. Barrington Manor Apartments Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Honeywell Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  2. Weir v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  3. Kantor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  4. Consumer Life Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  5. Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API