Legal Opinion

Camellia Apartments, Inc., the W & W Company, University Apartments, Inc. v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 17, 1964No. 344-62PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Judge.

The plaintiffs are three corporations which own and operate apartment houses located in the State of Georgia. 1 The buildings, which were designed for rent to war workers, were constructed with financing supplied through mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration pursuant to section 608 of the Federal Housing Act. 2

After plaintiffs had owned the apartment buildings for some time, they obtained commitments to refinance their properties under conventional mortgages that were not FHA-insured. The Commissioner of the Federal Housing Administration, as a prerequisite…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clapp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Aerolineas Argentinas, and Pakistan International Airlines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  2. Ontario Power Generation, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Casa De Cambio Comdiv S.A., De C v. V. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  4. Maniere v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  5. Barrington Manor Apartments Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API