Camellia Apartments, Inc., the W & W Company, University Apartments, Inc. v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
WHITAKER, Judge.
The plaintiffs are three corporations which own and operate apartment houses located in the State of Georgia. 1 The buildings, which were designed for rent to war workers, were constructed with financing supplied through mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration pursuant to section 608 of the Federal Housing Act. 2
After plaintiffs had owned the apartment buildings for some time, they obtained commitments to refinance their properties under conventional mortgages that were not FHA-insured. The Commissioner of the Federal Housing Administration, as a prerequisite…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Clapp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
3Cited by17 opinions
- Aerolineas Argentinas, and Pakistan International Airlines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Ontario Power Generation, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Casa De Cambio Comdiv S.A., De C v. V. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Maniere v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Barrington Manor Apartments Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.