Legal Opinion

Grymes Hill Manor Estates v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 17, 1967No. 311-66PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case was referred to Trial Commissioner Herbert N. Maletz with directions to make his recommendation for conclusions of law on defendant’s motion to dismiss and plaintiff’s plea for judgment on the pleadings. The commissioner has done so in a report and opinion filed on November 30, 1966. The case has been submitted to the court on the briefs of the parties without oral argument of counsel. Since the court agrees with the commissioner’s report, opinion and recommended conclusion of law, as hereinafter set forth, it hereby adopts the same as the basis for its judgment in this ease.…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barrington Manor Apartments Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  2. Cherry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  3. Cherry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  4. Demko v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  5. Barrington Manor Apartments Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API