Legal Opinion

Rosenkrantz v. Barde

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

It appears from the record that the United States government had seized and condemned a cargo of arms and ammunition carried by a vessel violating the neutrality laws and had ad*340vertised them for sale at Aberdeen, Washington. It is alleged in the complaint and admitted in the answer:

“II.
“That prior to the date of said sale, plaintiffs and defendant entered into an agreement, whereby the said parties agreed that defendant should bid at said sale for and on behalf of said parties, each of said parties promising and agreeing’ to contribute 1/6 of any sum bid at said sale by defendant, not to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. State v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  3. De Leon v. Manuel Trevino & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1878
  4. McDonald v. LundWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Kearney v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Robert N. Cameron and Jack Crawford v. Vancouver Plywood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  2. W. J. Seufert Land Co. v. GreenfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Newport Construction Co. v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Pyle v. KernanOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Albina Marine Iron WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API