Legal Opinion

Pyle v. Kernan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1934PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

In July, 1929, the state highway commission called for bids on a contract to resurface 12 miles of the Roosevelt coast highway between Riverton and Bandon, in Coos county, and to furnish 15,400 yards of broken stone for highway construction purposes. The specifications called for Tupper rock, that is, rock to be obtained from a certain quarry located near Ban-don. The commission considered the bids excessive and therefore rejected them. The following month a second call for bids was made. Pursuant to this call the following bids were submitted: Guy Pyle and the Newport Construction Co.,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Robert G. Lassiter & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. City of Mankato v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. Safety Insulated Wire & Cable Co. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1895
  4. Conway v. Garden City Paving & Post Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Newport Construction Co. v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harrell v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Bagley v. Mt. Bachelor, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. A-1 Sandblasting & Steamcleaning Co. v. BaidenOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Home Owners Construction Co. v. Borough of Glen RockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  5. Hanna v. Bd. of Ed. of Wicomico Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API