State v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The ease is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBartol, C. J.
The questions presented by this appeal are of very great interest and importance; more on account of the character of the parties, and the large amount of money involved, than by reason of any intrinsic difficulty in the questions themselves. These depend for their solution upon plain and íamiliár principles of law, which are not affected in their application either by the amount in controversy or the dignity and power of the parties litigant.
The action is indebitatus assumpsit, instituted by the appellant against the appellee on the 6th day of May, 1870.
The declaration contains a count “ for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Crandall v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- McBlair v. GibbesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Mayor of Baltimore v. LeffermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1846
- Lester v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Katz v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Austin v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- United States F. & G. Co. v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Board of Trustees v. John K. Ruff, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Mayor of Baltimore v. State Ex Rel. BluefordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.