Gagnon v. Carrier

It is understood from the oral arguments that the defendants do not seriously press their exception to that part of the decree which determines that the defendants have no right of way over plaintiff’s land to the lake for recreational purposes. Therefore it is not necessary to detail the evidence supporting the decree and it is sufficient to say that the decree of the Court relating to the right of way is clearly correct.

The mere non-user of an easement, however acquired, does not result in its loss or destruction even if continued for a long period of time. New England Box Co. v. Wood, 81…