Downing House Realty v. Hampe
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.
This appeal requires us to determine whether the master erred in finding that an easement had not been abandoned and that the use being made of the easement by the plaintiff, Downing House Realty (Downing House), was reasonable. In a Master’s {Robert C. Varney, Esq.) report, approved by the Superior. Court {DiClerico, J.), the court permanently enjoined the defendant, Judith Hampe, and her tenants and agents from interfering with the plaintiff’s use of the easement. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
The facts as found by the master are as follows. The plaintiff and the defendant own,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sakansky v. WeinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
- Logan v. BrodrickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Delaney v. GurrieriSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Gagnon v. CarrierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951
- Titcomb v. AnthonySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Flanagan v. PrudhommeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Arcidi v. Town of RyeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Weeks v. Wolf Creek Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Nadeau v. Town of DurhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Strahin v. LantzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.