Legal Opinion

Les v. Alibozek

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 25, 1929PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The facts material to the determination of this appeal are as follows: Prior to his death, one Burlingame owned two adjoining farms known as the “Hill” and the “South” farms. In 1913 his heirs conveyed the South farm to Horn with a right of way two rods wide (which hereafter will be called the new way) along the line of one Perrault’s land over part of the Hill farm to the highway. In 1914 Burlingame’s heirs conveyed the Hill farm to Horn. For many years there had been a way in use from the house on the South farm northeasterly across meadow lands of the South and Hill farms to the highway…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pizer v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  2. Willets v. LanghaarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Day v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Parsons v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Dubinsky v. CamaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mt. Holyoke Realty Corp. v. Holyoke Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Row v. Home Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Oldfield v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Desotell v. SzczygielMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  5. Delconte v. SalloumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API