Legal Opinion

Tri-Bullion Smelting & Development Co. v. Jacobsen

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 9, 1916No. 101PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action by Ernest O. Jacobsen, doing business as E. O. Jacobsen & Co., against the Tri-Bullion Smelting .& Development Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

Read the full summary

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action by Ernest O. Jacobsen, doing business as E. O. Jacobsen & Co., against the Tri-Bullion Smelting .& Development Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Writ of error to the District Court for the Southern District of New York to review a judgment in favor of defendant in error (plaintiff below) for $5,847.31 after a verdict by direction of the court. Plaintiff below will he referred to as “Jacobsen” and defendant as “Tri-Bullion.”

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, District Judge.

The action was brought by Jacobsen against Tri-Bullion to recover damages in the sum of $25,000 for breach of contract by Tri-Bullion. The essential features of the written agreement, expressing the contract between the parties, were as follows:(1) Tri-Bullion was to sell and Jacobsen to buy the output of zinc concentrates produced at Tri-Bullion’s plant at Kelly, N. M., for a period of two years from November 22, 1911, to November 22, 1913, concentrates to be delivered in as nearly as possible equal monthly quantities, with the agreement by Tri-Bullion that the minimum…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Allegheny Valley Brick Co. v. C. W. Raymond Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  3. Reis v. RosenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  4. Marks v. Van EeghenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  5. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. O'Neill-Adams Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. William B. Tanner Co., Inc., and Pepper & Tanner, Inc. v. Wioo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. Bu-Vi-Bar Petroleum Corporation v. KrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  4. Federal Life Ins. Co. v. RascoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
  5. Lagerloef Trading Co. v. American Paper Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API