Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Pease

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1923No. 18017PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.

— Respondent recovered damages for personal injuries resulting from the negligence of appellants in the operation of their automobile.

*164As an affirmative defense to the complaint of respondent, the answer of appellant set forth the following :

“I. That the plaintiff, at the time said accident occurred, was a fireman in the employ of the fire department of the said city of Seattle, and was engaged in the performance of his duties as such fireman, when said accident occurred and his alleged injuries received.
“II. That the work in which the plaintiff was engaged at the time said accident occurred…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peet v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Ross v. Erickson Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Perry v. BeverageWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. McDonald v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  5. Lynch v. City of North YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Phoenix v. YatesArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Harris v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  3. Bland v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State Ex Rel. Knez v. SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Christie v. the Port of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API