Legal Opinion
Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 4, 1997No. Slip Op. 97-14. Court No. 95-03-00236PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge:
Plaintiffs, Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A. (collectively “Koyo”), challenge the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”) determination that certain rough forgings imported by Koyo are within the scope of the antidumping duty order, entitled Antidumping Duty Order, Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From Japan (“1987 TRB Order ”), 52 Fed.Reg. 37,352 (Oct. 6,1987). See Final Affirmative Determination in Scope Inquiry on Antidumping Duty Order on Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- The Timken Company v. The United States, and China National MacHinery and Equipment Import and Export CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Diversified Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Novosteel SA v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Coalition for the Preservation of American Brake Drum & Rotor Aftermarket Manufacturers v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Wirth Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Rubberflex Sdn. Bhd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.