Legal Opinion
Rubberflex Sdn. Bhd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 23, 1999No. Slip Op. 99-68; Court 97-12-02180PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOLDBERG, Judge.
In this action, the Court reviews challenges to the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) final determination for the second administrative review of an anti-dumping duty order covering extruded rubber thread from Malaysia. Extruded Rubber Thread From Malaysia; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 62 Fed.Reg. 62,547 (Nov. 24, 1997) {“Final Results”). Plaintiff Rubberflex Sdn. Bhd. (“Rubberflex”) argues that (1) the manner in which Commerce conducted the second administrative review, particularly verification, prejudiced Rubberflex; (2) Commerce was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Allied-Signal Aerospace Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Ppg Industries, Inc. v. The United States, and Vitro Flotado, S.A. And Vidrio Plano De Mexico, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fujian MacHinery & Equipment Import & Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Nsk Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Jinan Yipin Corp., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Kaiyuan Group Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.