Legal Opinion

Fort Sill Gardens, Inc. v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 21, 1966No. 187-63PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDdreee, Judge

The present motions were submitted without oral argument to the court for its decision. Plaintiff is an Oklahoma corporation organized with an FHA form charter and bylaws in accordance with requirements of the Federal Housing Administration for the purpose of owning and operating a 72-unit garden-type rental housing project, known as Fort Sill Garden Apartments, located at Lawton, Oklahoma.

Fort Sill Gardens was originally constructed-in 1952 under-section 908, Title IX of the National Housing Act, 12 TJ.S.C. § 1750 (g) (1964 ed.) The- pro j ect, although FHA mortgage insured, was privately…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Harvey Ward Locke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  3. Ray B. Woodbury v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. Chain Belt Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  5. United States v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gregory Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  2. FerminUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. Estate of Dunaway v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  4. WionUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API