Legal Opinion

Estate of Dunaway v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 2, 1989No. 405-88CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, District Judge.

This case is presently before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. RUSCC 12(b). The court will consider all of the allegations of the party opposing the motion as true.1 Mortensen v. First Fed. Sav. and Loan Ass’n., 549 F.2d 884, 891 (3d Cir.1977). At this point in the proceedings, the court chooses not to consider matters outside the pleadings and convert this motion into one for summary judgement.

FACTS

In 1970, Congress passed the King…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  5. Ray B. Woodbury v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API