Legal Opinion

Miller v. Downtown D.C. Business Improvement District

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 17, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2017-0389Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) RAYONNA MILLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17–389 (RBW) ) DOWNTOWN BID SERVICES ) CORPORATION, 1 ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION The pro se plaintiff, Rayonna Miller, brings this civil action against the defendant, Downtown BID Services Corporation, alleging that the defendant retaliated against her for filing a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-1 to -17 (2012). See Complaint (“Compl.”); Letter from…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API