Legal Opinion
Nacht & Lewis Architects, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 1996No. C023308PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
Real party in interest (plaintiff) filed a civil complaint against petitioners (defendants) regarding her former employment with defendant Nacht & Lewis Architects, Inc. In response to Judicial Council approved form interrogatory No. 12.1, defendants provided the names of seven persons who witnessed, or who defendants claimed had knowledge of, the “incident,” defined as “the circumstances and events surrounding the alleged accident, injury, or other occurrence or breach of contract giving rise to this action or proceeding.” However, defendants objected to and refused to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Rodriguez v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Sav-On Drugs, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. BoehmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. CoddingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Wellpoint Health Networks, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Rico v. Mitsubishi Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Coito v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Mcveigh v. Recology San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.