Legal Opinion
Smith v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 7, 1961No. Civ. 10105PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
Petitioner, W. Marguerite P. Smith, seeks a writ of mandate to compel Robert Alfred (referred to hereafter as Alfred) to answer certain interrogatories which he refused to answer and which the respondent court ruled he did not have to answer.
Petitioner brought an action to recover damages for injuries she received while a passenger in an automobile which was being operated by her deceased husband and which was involved in an accident with an automobile being driven by Alfred. She also brought an action for the wrongful death of her husband.
In each of the actions the petitioner served written…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Laddon v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY AND CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Pettie v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Ryan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Klop v. United Fruit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- McElroy v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Great American Insurance Company v. MurrayTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. SotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Gebhard v. NiedzwieckiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.