Legal Opinion

Geeo v. Bonded Filter Co., LLC

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided December 2, 2022No. 3:22-cv-00359Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DANIEL GEEO, on his own behalf and ) on behalf of those similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 3:22-cv-00359 v. ) Judge Aleta A. Trauger ) BONDED FILTER CO., LLC, d/b/a ) BFC Solutions, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM Before the court is the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 21) plaintiff Daniel Geeo’s Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 19) under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No. 21.) For the reasons set forth herein, the motion will be granted. I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API