Legal Opinion
De La Paz v. Bayer Healthcare LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 2, 2016No. C 15-03995 WHAPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
WILLIAM ALSUP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
INTRODUCTION
In this personal-injury action involving a permanent female contraceptive device, *1088defendants have moved to dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion is GRANTED.
STATEMENT
Plaintiff Tanya De La Paz is an individual who resides in South Carolina who sought to have Essure, a permanent female contraceptive device, implanted in her fallopian tubes in July 2012. This action arises from several complications that De La Paz suffered as a result of alleged…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Williams v. Bayer Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- In re Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- Burrell v. Bayer Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2017
- Vieira v. Mentor Worldwide, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Albritton v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.