Legal Opinion
Burrell v. Bayer Corp.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided May 10, 2017No. DOCKET NO. 1:17-cv-00031-MOC-DCKPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Max O. Cogburn Jr., United States District Judge
THIS MATTER is before the court on the pending Motion to Dismiss (# 11) in this matter as well as the plaintiffs Motion to Reconsider or Alternatively Certify for Appeal (# 33).1 Having considered the Motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order.
*488FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
I. Background
This is a case regarding the birth1 control medical device, Essure. The device was inserted into the plaintiff, and soon thereafter problems arose, which precipitated this suit.2
■ 'Essure is a Class III medical device regulated by the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kristiana Burrell v. Bayer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Avadis v. AzarDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022
- Blankenship v. Fox News Network, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2021
- COHEN v. SUBARU CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- Doe v. Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.