Legal Opinion
Jakoubek v. Fortis Benefits Insurance
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided October 29, 2003No. 8:03CV290PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PIESTER, United States Magistrate Judge.
The plaintiff, Mona R. Jakoubek (“Jak-oubek”) filed suit against Fortis Benefits Insurance Company (“Fortis”), a Minnesota Corporation, and the State of Nebraska and its Department of Administrative Services (“State defendants”). The plaintiff seeks a declaration that she is totally disabled and entitled to payments under a Fortis long term disability insurance policy she obtained through her employment with the Department of Administrative Services (“DAS”), an agency of the State of Nebraska (“State”). Fortis removed the case to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Illinois v. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Minnesota v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chisholm v. United of Omaha Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Graybill-Bundgard v. Standard InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank v. Morgan Stanley & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- West Virginia Ex Rel. McGraw v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2005
- Hoffman v. ConnecticutDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.