Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Connecticut

District Court, D. Maine

Decided September 18, 2009No. Civil 09-79-B-HPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AFFIRMING IN PART THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.

Upon de novo review, I Affirm the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision to dismiss the complaint against the defendants Farrell, Martinez and Rosario for lack of personal jurisdiction, and have nothing to add to her explanation.

Upon de novo review, I also Affirm her Recommended Decision to dismiss the sole federal claim. I agree with her reasoning, but add the following: Count II, invoking 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is the plaintiffs’ only federal claim. It charges a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  4. Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Lincoln Property Co. v. RocheSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. State of TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2023
  2. WROBEL v. STATE OF MAINEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
  3. WROBEL v. STATE OF MAINEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
  4. WROBEL v. STATE OF MAINEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API