Legal Opinion
Chisholm v. United of Omaha Life Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 28, 2007No. 3:06 CV 1958(MRK)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
MARK R. KRAVITZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mabel Chisholm filed this action pro se on December 5, 2006. Her Complaint names as defendants the United of Omaha Life Insurance Company (“United”), Compl. [doc. # 1-2] 1 and the State of Connecticut, Department of Social Services (“DSS”), which administers Connecticut’s Medicaid program, Compl. [doc. # 1-3], as required by Connecticut General Statutes § 17b-2. As against United, Ms. Chisholm asserts various tort claims including conspiracy, and invasion of privacy, as well as insurance, health care, mail and wire fraud. She…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Keitt v. New York CityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Amara v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Dunham v. City of N.Y.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Griffin v. DoeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2014
- Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank v. Morgan Stanley & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.