Legal Opinion

Hall v. Banc One Management Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 2007No. 2006-0703PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} The issue presented in this appeal concerns whether a trial court, while empaneling a jury, may exercise discretion to deny a statutory challenge that the legislature has stated constitutes good cause to excuse a prospective juror. Upon review, we conclude that the statutory challenges for cause catalogued in R.C. 2313.42(A) through (I) consist of objectively verifiable facts and conclusions, which, if found valid by the court, require the court to excuse the prospective juror and thereby preclude the exercise of judicial discretion to seat that prospective juror. R.C. 2313.42(J),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Berk v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  5. Whitaker v. M.T. Automotive, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Grundy v. DhillonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Anderson v. Bright Horizons Children's Ctrs., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Meyers v. Goodrich Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Garry v. BorgerOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API