Legal Opinion

Hollinger-Haye v. Western/Franki-Denys

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 25, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 89-1270PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

JOHN GARRETT PENN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s Motion For Leave To File Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiff seeks a second amended complaint to add twelve causes of action.1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) provides that leave to amend “shall be freely given when justice so requires.” However, the Court recognizes that when the motion to amend is filed late in the litigation, justice requires the Court to determine whether there is prejudice to the defendants.

Plaintiff filed this suit in D.C. Superior Court on April 17, 1989. On May 9,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Russell Wayne Anderson v. Usair, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  2. Anderson v. USAir, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1985

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. Cafe AsiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  2. Onyewuchi v. GonzalezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc. v. Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, PLLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Hawthorne v. Rushmore Loan Management Services LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API