Legal Opinion
United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 29, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2004-0798PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
G. MICHAEL HARVEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This case was referred to the undersigned for the management of discovery. Currently ripe is the United States’ motion for protective order relating to Claimant Pavel Lazarenko’s discovery requests concerning a failed 2002 plea agreement in Claimant’s criminal case and the government’s mutual legal assistance treaty (“MLAT”) requests to Guernsey and Antigua. 1 After reviewing the entire record, 2 the Court will grant the motion.
BACKGROUND
The factual background concerning this in rem asset forfeiture action has been described…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- I.A.M. National Pension Fund, Benefit Plan a v. Industrial Gear Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Food Lion, Incorporated v. United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio-Clc, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-ClcCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. Yang Kun "Michael" ChungDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2017
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank JuliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Application of Lucille Holdings Pte Ltd Under 28 U.S.C. 1782 v. Edge Funds Management LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Borum v. Brentwood Village, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Breiterman v. U.S. Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.