Legal Opinion
Onyewuchi v. Gonzalez
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 17, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2008-0360PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend the First Amended Complaint and Reopen Discovery; Granting the Defendant Leave to Supplement its Dispositive Motion to Address the Disparate Impact Claims Raised in the First Amended Complaint
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This ease comes before the court on the plaintiffs motion for leave to amend the first amended complaint and to reopen discovery. The pro se plaintiff, an African-American attorney and naturalized citizen originally from Nigeria, alleges that the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Atherton v. District of Columbia Office of the MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc. v. Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, PLLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- State v. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Robinson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Calzada v. AlikhanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Calzada v. RobertsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.