Legal Opinion

Harbold v. Reading

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1946No. Appeal, 13PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

This action represents an attempt to impose an absolute liability on the City of Reading for the payment of bonds which expressly provided that no such liability should exist, such payment being directed, however, by a validating Act of May 26,1943, P. L. 660.

In 1932 the city enacted an ordinance authorizing the paving and curbing of Kenhorst Boulevard and Old Wyomissing Road. The ordinance provided that the work should be paid for and assessments levied on the abutting properties should be collected in the manner provided by an ordinance of 1925. According…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Berman v. Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Stanley v. JeffriesMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Stemmler v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Bush v. . Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Bailey v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Rivenbark v. Finis P. Ernest, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Denbow v. Borough of LeetsdaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Koike v. Board of Water SupplyHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Department of Highways of Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API