Legal Opinion
Dial Temporary Help Service, Inc. v. Shrock
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 27, 1996No. Civil 95-1242-FRPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRYE, District Judge.
The matter before the court is the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (# 16). The defendants, Loren E. Shrock, Betty Jean Shrock, and Alpha Services, Inc., move the court for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to all of the claims filed against them in this action.
UNDISPUTED FACTS
In 1986, Loren and Betty Jean Shrock operated a secretarial service in Wilsonville, Oregon. Peter Szambelan is the president and the sole shareholder, along with his wife, of the plaintiff, Dial Temporary Help Service, Inc. (Dial). A…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,468 Ernest C. Hector v. Herman Wiens, Individually and Dba Wiens Feed LotCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ameritox, Ltd. v. SavelichDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. VONAGE AM.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Commercial Fire Protection, LLC v. PiggDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Mayor v. Vonage America Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- The Green Trading Company, LLC v. ShyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025