Legal Opinion
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. VONAGE AM.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 16, 2008No. Civil No. JFM 07-320PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
(2008)
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, Plaintiff,
v.
VONAGE AMERICA INC., Defendant.
Civil No. JFM 07-320.
United States District Court, D. Maryland.
April 16, 2008.
OPINION
J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mayor and City Council of Baltimore ("the City") has brought suit against defendant Vonage America Inc. ("Vonage") pursuant to Md.Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 3-403,[1] for a declaratory judgment that the City's Telecommunications Tax applies to Vonage. (Compl. ¶¶ 1, 14-18.) In addition, under Maryland common law and Md.Code Ann. Art. 24 § 9-704,[2] the City requests that this…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Rosewell v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- California v. Grace Brethren ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Jefferson County v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Goldberg v. SweetSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Courtney M. Kay-Decker, Director, Iowa Department of Revenue v. Iowa State Board of Tax Review and Cable One, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Cable One, Inc. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Buchanan County v. EQUITABLE PRODUCTION CO.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2011
- Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. VONAGEDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Courtney M. Kay-Decker, Director, Iowa Department of Revenue v. Iowa State Board of Tax Review and Cable One, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.