Parnell v. River Bend Carriers, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge. *
A commissioner’s representative denied relator’s claim for unemployment benefits, concluding relator did not have good cause to voluntarily quit his job with respondent River Bend Carriers. Relator obtained a writ of certiorari, arguing he had good cause to quit as a result of River Bend’s requirement that he violate federal trucking laws. We agree and reverse.
FACTS
Relator Peter Parnell was a truck driver for respondent River Bend Carriers between 1985 and November 1990. River Bend was a small interstate trucking company, with three full-time drivers and one…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Geo. A. Hormel & Co. v. AsperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Larson v. Department of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Porrazzo v. Nabisco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gorr v. Sheridan Travels, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Patricia A. Sherman v. Mississippi Employment Security CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- Sherman v. Mississippi Employment Security CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 2008