Legal Opinion

Parnell v. River Bend Carriers, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 26, 1992No. C9-91-2292PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge. *

A commissioner’s representative denied relator’s claim for unemployment benefits, concluding relator did not have good cause to voluntarily quit his job with respondent River Bend Carriers. Relator obtained a writ of certiorari, arguing he had good cause to quit as a result of River Bend’s requirement that he violate federal trucking laws. We agree and reverse.

FACTS

Relator Peter Parnell was a truck driver for respondent River Bend Carriers between 1985 and November 1990. River Bend was a small interstate trucking company, with three full-time drivers and one…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Geo. A. Hormel & Co. v. AsperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Larson v. Department of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Porrazzo v. Nabisco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gorr v. Sheridan Travels, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Patricia A. Sherman v. Mississippi Employment Security CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Sherman v. Mississippi Employment Security CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API