Legal Opinion
In Re: Daimlerchrysler Corporation, Formerly Known as Chrysler Corporation Ford Motor Company General Motors Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 14, 2002No. 02-40741, 02-40742PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:
The petitioners, DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, and General Motors Corporation (the “Auto Makers”) sought writs of mandamus from this court, directing the district court to recall its remand orders. They also sought to have these cases and future friction products claims involving the petitioners assigned to a different district judge on remand. We granted the mandamus petitions and the request for reassignment. See In re: DaimlerChrysler Corp., Nos. 02-40741 & 02-40742 (5th Cir. May 31, 2002). We found these cases to be identical to five related cases we…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Raymond RobinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. National Medical Enterprises, Inc., and Nme Hospitals, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Benchmark Electronics, Inc. v. J.M. Huber Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Test Masters Educational Services, Inc. v. SinghCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Miller v. Sam Houston State UnivCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Abigail Ransom v. M. Patel Enterprises, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.