Legal Opinion

United States v. Raymond Robin

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 30, 1977No. 951, Docket 76-1033PublishedCited by 233 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellee’s petition for rehearing has been denied by the panel which heard the appeal. In response to a request by one member of the court for a rehearing of the appeal en banc, a majority has voted against such a rehearing. However, we unanimously consider it appropriate, since the propriety of our exercise of power under Title 28 U.S.C. § 2106 to direct that the case be assigned to a different judge for resentencing has been questioned, sua sponte to review the factors that should be considered in exercising that authority. Because our expressions on the subject have been fragmentary, an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gregg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Wingo v. WeddingSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. Evan Alexander ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Edmund RosnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by233 opinions

  1. Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. Bernard Cullen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. National Medical Enterprises, Inc., and Nme Hospitals, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Steven W. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

228 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API