Legal Opinion

Krueger v. Grinnell Mut. Reinsurance Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2018No. 28555PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, Chief Justice

[¶ 1.] Steven and Coralee Krueger filed a complaint against Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. (Grinnell) alleging failure to pay underinsured motorist benefits. The Kruegers served written discovery requests on Grinnell. Grinnell responded but raised several objections. The Kruegers wrote a letter demanding answers to certain discovery requests within a week. Grinnell did not respond, and the Kruegers filed a motion to compel. The circuit court granted the Kruegers' motion in its entirety, finding that Grinnell had sufficient notice of the Kruegers' bad faith claim and thus had intentionally…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shuffle Master, Inc. v. Progressive Games, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1996
  2. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. Yang Kun "Michael" ChungDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2017
  3. Williams v. Board of County Commissioners of the Unified Government of Wyandotte CountyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  4. Layne Christensen Co. v. Purolite Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2010
  5. Cotracom Commodity Trading Co. v. Seaboard Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. S.D. Petroleum Release Compensation Fund v. BpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State Farm v. MirandaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Noel v. Pathology Med. Servs.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API