Holt v. Henry
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From an order granting defendants’ motion for a new trial on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury, plaintiff appeals.
The record discloses that early in 1941 the county of Los Angeles purchased a ten story building at 800 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, to be used as an office building. The county entered into a contract with Mr. Nichols, a general building contractor, to modernize the structure. One phase of the work to be done by the general contractor was to cut a twin elevator shaft through all floors of the building. This work included the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Anderson v. I. M. Jameson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Dowd v. Atlas Taxicab & Auto Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Cauhape v. Security Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Parker v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baker v. B. F. Goodrich Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Covely v. C.A.B. Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Ward v. SilveriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Valentine v. RatnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Brown v. HigbeeAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1959