Legal Opinion
Parker v. Brown
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 28, 1936No. Civ. 10334PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The complaint in this action is in two counts, one asking damages for breach of contract; the other seeking damages because of fraudulent representations inducing the execution thereof. The contract was between plaintiffs and the incorporated respondent, hereinafter referred to as “corporation”. The individual respondents were connected with the corporation. H. T. James was president and sole stockholder. The specific capacity of Snyder is not called to our attention.
On the 23d of July and 10th of December, 1927, it is alleged in the first cause of action that two several contracts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Philbrook v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Rosenberg v. Geo. A. Moore & Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Stirnus v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Jones v. Goldtree Bros. Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Marr v. WhistlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Koyer v. McComberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Holt v. HenryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Goodman v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Mortimer v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- State v. PierceMontana Supreme Court · 1982