Legal Opinion
State v. Coleman
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 21, 1978No. 4888-1PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.
Denise Coleman appeals a conviction of grand larceny, contending the State failed to introduce evidence sufficient to establish the minimum value of stolen property necessary for such a judgment and sentencing. We agree and remand for resentencing based upon a petit larceny conviction.
The statute then applicable and by which appellant was charged (RCW 9.54.090(6), since repealed by Laws of 1975, ch. 260, effective July 1, 1976) asserted that one who stole
[pjroperty of the value of more than seventy-five dollars . . . shall be guilty of grand larceny and be punished by imprisonment in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. SwensonWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- United States v. Charles Haskel WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Orr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- State v. McPhieIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. KleistWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. WhiteConnecticut Superior Court · 1981
- Amtruck Factors v. International Forest ProductsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.