Legal Opinion
Seckerson v. Sinclair
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 20, 1912PublishedCited by 19 opinions
Motions by respondent to dismiss tbe appeal and also to vacate an order made by a-judge of this court permitting a supersedeas undertaking on appeal to be given.
1Per curiam
Tbe motions in tbe case at bar present tbe same questions that were just decided by us in tbe case of Burger v. Sinclair [next case] 140 N. W. 235, and tbe decision in tbat case controls tbis. Tbe same order will accordingly be made herein, with tbe exception tbat no costs are allowed.
Goss, L, being disqualified, did not participate.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Burger v. SinclairNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hoffer v. BurdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Storley v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Reynolds v. HenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Patch v. SebeliusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Wicklund v. AllraumWashington Supreme Court · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.