Legal Opinion

Kattelman v. National Union Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1964No. Appeal, 205PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

The plaintiffs, Leon Kattelman and Phyllis, his wife, sued the defendant, the National Union Fire In surance Company, in assumpsit, to recover for damage to their dwelling, which was insured against collapse by the extended coverage endorsement in a fire insurance policy issued by the defendant. The case was tried before a judge without a jury, resulting in a finding for the plaintiffs. Subsequently, exceptions filed by the defendant were sustained and judgment entered for the defendant. The plaintiffs appealed.

The facts are not in dispute:

The dwelling house of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Waldman v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Central Mutual Insurance Co. v. RoyalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Skelly v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Ehrlich v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Robinson v. StoverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. 401 Fourth Street, Inc. v. Investors Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Meritcare Incorporated Meritcare Ventures, Inc. Quinlan Medical, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. Government Employees Insurance v. DeJamesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  5. Dominick v. Statesman InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API