Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Miller v. Mead Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1979No. 78-388PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellee’s disability is not the result of an injury, within the meaning of the Workers’ Compensation Act, since an injury “comprehends a physical or traumatic damage or harm,” which must be “accidental in its character in the sense of being the result of a sudden mishap occurring by chance, unexpectedly and not in the usual course of events, at a particular time and place.” Malone v. Indus. Comm. (1942), 140 Ohio St. 292, 43 N. E. 2d 266, paragraph one of the svllabus; Bowman v. National Graphics Corp. (1978), 55 Ohio St. 2d 222, 224, 378 N. E. 2d 1056.

The issue, therefore, is whether a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Malone v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State ex rel. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. KriseOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Bowman v. National Graphics Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brody v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Compton v. 7-Up Bottling Co./Brooks Beverage ManagementOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. McRoberts v. Gen. Elec. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Ford v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Frazier v. MayfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API