Legal Opinion

Brody v. Mihm

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1995No. 93-2252PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

The issue is whether the claimant in this case has presented a compensable workers’ compensation claim for the aggravation of a nonoccupational disease. In State ex rel. Miller v. Mead Corp. (1979), 58 Ohio St.2d 405, 12 O.O.3d 348, 390 N.E.2d 1192, claimant suffered from a pre-existing hearing loss as the result of artillery fire he encountered during World War II. He filed a compensation claim alleging that loud noise in the machine room at his job had aggravated his pre-existing condition. We found first that claimant’s disability was not the result of an “injury.” In so doing, we relied…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Village v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ryan v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Oswald v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Bryant v. Masters MacHine Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Compton v. 7-Up Bottling Co./Brooks Beverage ManagementOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. White v. Center Manufacturing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. McRoberts v. Gen. Elec. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Frye v. Weber & Sons Service Repair, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Gallaher v. Manpower International, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API