Brody v. Mihm
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
The issue is whether the claimant in this case has presented a compensable workers’ compensation claim for the aggravation of a nonoccupational disease. In State ex rel. Miller v. Mead Corp. (1979), 58 Ohio St.2d 405, 12 O.O.3d 348, 390 N.E.2d 1192, claimant suffered from a pre-existing hearing loss as the result of artillery fire he encountered during World War II. He filed a compensation claim alleging that loud noise in the machine room at his job had aggravated his pre-existing condition. We found first that claimant’s disability was not the result of an “injury.” In so doing, we relied…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Village v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Ryan v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Oswald v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Bryant v. Masters MacHine Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Compton v. 7-Up Bottling Co./Brooks Beverage ManagementOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- White v. Center Manufacturing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
- McRoberts v. Gen. Elec. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Frye v. Weber & Sons Service Repair, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Gallaher v. Manpower International, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.