Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Mayfield

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1989No. CA 11351PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grady, Judge.

In this appeal we must determine whether the court of common pleas erred in granting summary judgment against the appellant’s workers’ compensation appeal. At issue is whether the evidence before the trial court, concerning appellant’s alleged occupational disease, is sufficient to conclude the ailment was a condition predating employment and therefore noncompensable within the meaning of State, ex rel. Miller, v. Mead Corp. (1979), 58 Ohio St.2d 405, 12 O.O.3d 348, 390 N.E.2d 1192.

For the reasons stated below, we reverse the granting of summary judgment and remand to the trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. KriseOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Miller v. Mead Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allied Fibers v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  2. Allied Fibers v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API