Witt v. Robbins

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The plaintiff appellant and defendant Robbins suffered an intersection collision from which this damage suit arises. The jury found for Robbins on Witt’s complaint and for Witt on Robbins’ cross bill.

1. The court gave a correct and proper instruction on comparative negligence, should the jury find that negligence on the part of both parties concurred in causing the damage. It is attacked on the basis that since the injury to the plaintiff resulted at an intersection collision controlled by traffic lights the negligence had to be all on one side or the other and there was…